Article Critique Genetically Modified Food Essay Example for Free

name Critique Genetic every(prenominal)y Modified Food EssayThe article by Amin, Jahi and Nor was conducted in Malaysia to find step to the fore the stakeholders attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine (1). In particular, the investigators were interested to know the attitude towards GM insulin/medicine, GM handle oil color and GM soybean. They designed the study as a survey with 1017 respondents. They found that the Malayan stakeholders are cautious ab start the genetically modified foods. They agreed that genetically modified foods have comprehend benefits exactly at the analogous time they were concerned active the moral aspects and risks associated with the GM Foods. A hand-to-hand analysis revealed difference stakeholders attitudes towards GM foods. Title The deed of conveyance stakeholders attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine was punctilious and all the way thought out. Readers are well informed of what to expect as they engage with t he study findings. However, the title missed on the study area. A good title must inform readers where the study is conducted. nonfigurative The researchers follow non structure abstract. They were able to point out the background leading to the study, the purpose of survey, research approaches they utilize trough the study and the findings.With regard to this they managed to give a brief overview of the research Jones 2 and win let readers know what their study entailed and what they found out. A structured abstract would have been more desirable as it enlists each of the study sections. However, depending with the journal requirements and authors interests they preferred non structured abstract to one that is structured. Purpose of the Study The investigators cash in ones chipsly pointed out the aim of the study. They assessed and compared the attitudes of the Malaysian stakeholders living in the Klang Valley towards genetically modified insulin, palm oil and soybeans.This wa s influenced by the findings from the other studies. For instance, other studies revealed that the advancement in technology led to increased production of GM Foods. In addition, they found that biotechnology is one of the five major technologies that are planned to speed industrialisation in Malaysia. However, owing to the divisive debate on genetically modified foods, the researchers saw the need for this study. Therefore, it has clear cut intent of telling where Malaysians attitudes leans and what measures should be put in place to better their attitude.Research Approaches The investigators adopted a well defined research approach. They designed the study as a survey which was conducted from June, 2004 to February, 2005. The sampling size was 107 respondents above 18 years. They were selected through stratification sampling which enabled the generalization of the findings and minimized biased that could leave alone from sample selection. In addition, they collected the data thro ugh administering questionnaire and ensured that reliability and validity of the study are all accounted for.However, the researchers did not tell the readers how they met the ethical principles, especially principles of ethics of beneficence and Jones 3 justice. They didnt point out whether they consulted any ethical institution or whether they sought consent in the beginning recruiting the respondents. Results The study findings were consistent with the objective. The findings focus on on six dimensions of the stakeholders attitudes including moral concerns, perceived benefits, familiarity, encouragement, risk acceptance and perceived risks. From the findings it was clear that majority of the stakeholders were not familiar with the three GM products.It was more surprising when the findings indicated that biology students were more familiar with the GM palm oil and GM soybeans than religious scholars. The findings further established that stakeholders are moderately concerned with the moral aspects of the GM products, moderately perceive the products as risky and moderately perceive the GM products as beneficial. All the same they encouraged the use of the three products, with most stakeholders supportive of GM palm oil. These findings were consistent with the other studies. For instance, in China, study by Zhang et al.(19) indicated that consumers were not familiar with GM products yet domestic consumption of GM soybeans was about 18% of the interviewees that were consuming soybeans. In addition, the findings were consistent with earlier studies by ISAAA-UIUC (14-15) which found that Asians accept GM foods but at the same acknowledge the risks they pose to health. Based on these consistencies, the study met the rigor of trustworthiness, applicability and reliability. The conclusions were pinched from the study. The investigators concluded that the Malaysian stakeholders attitude on GM products was cautious.Indeed, this is in tandem with the findings that th e stakeholders moderately perceive the GM products as both beneficial and Jones 4 detrimental to health. In addition the implications of the study were reported in the conclusion. They noted that the biotechnologists should assess the moral aspects, risks and benefits of the GM foods and thereafter engage the public on acceptance of the products before considering commercialization of the products. However, the researcher failed to point out the limitations of the study as well as the areas that need further research.Work CitedAmin, Latifah Jahi, Jamaluddin and Nor Abd. Stakeholders attitude to GM foods and medicine. The Scientific World Journal. 2013. Jones 5 International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), The social and cultural dimensions of agricultural biotechnology in Southeast Asia public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in Phillipines. ISAAA. Publications. Zha ng, Xi Huang, Jin Qiu, Ha and Huang, Zheng. A consumer segmentation study with regards to genetically modified food in urban China. Food Policy. 355. 2010.