Assess any ONE or TWO modern interpretations of the doctrine of Essay

assess any ONE or TWO modern interpretations of the doctrine of original perdition - Essay simulation3). Modern interpretations of the doctrine of original depravity typically come to the conclusion that given the involuntary spirit of inherited sin, it is reasonable to conclude that sin is not necessarily an evil or moral wrong, still also an explanation for the correct path to follow (Couehoven, 2009, p. 567). Modern philosophers such as Em soldieryuel Kant set the detail for later expansions on the interpretations of the doctrine of original sin. Kant argued that sin is connected to an case-by-cases will. In this regard, an individual sins when the individual acts on craving as opposed to rational reasoning. The freedom to choose between impulse and rational reasoning is the origins of sin (Hastings & Selbie, 2003, p. 563). Modern philosopher G.W.F. Hegel also argued that the doctrine of original sin merely recognizes that man can only be presumed to have the potential to be good and that man is not pictorially good (Hastings & Selbie, 2003, p. 563). Modern interpretations of the doctrine of original sin have focused on attempts to understand and conceptualize sin. For example Gustafson, in his conceptualization of sin argues that sin is an ancient religious symbol, therefore suggesting that sin is an inherited phenomenon (Gustafson, 1977, p. 156). This conceptualization of sin essentially provides a new understanding and interpretation of original sin. or else than a literal interpretation suggesting that mankind inherited the actual sins of Adam and Eve, Gustafsons conceptualization of sin indicates that man is inherently sinful. Gustafson accomplishes this by arguing that man is by nature, culture and society driven by self-interest (Gustafson, 1977, p. 156). According to Gustafson (1977), mans pursuit of self-interest alone is not a sin. It is the principle and motivation for pursuing self-interests that is sinful. Man by nature and circums tances in a world with change magnitude political, natural, scientific and economic complexities grow particularly anxious. In the absence of confidence in an ultimately received sovereign power man copes with anxieties by securing narrow self-interests (Gustafson, 1977, p. 156). In this regard Sin is a clement condition which leads to actions that seek security in the protection of narrow self-interests, actions that thus deny God... (Gustafson, 1977, p. 156). Thus fit to Gustafson (1977), the doctrine of original sin must be interpreted by reference to how sin and to a greater extent especially original sin can be conceptualized. This conceptualization of sin does not focus on the actual sins of Adam and Eve, but rather refers to the activities of Adam and Eve in ways that symbolize valet conditions, nature and experiences. Gustafson (1977) argues further that human activities are constrained by the what man has become. Man evolves out of natural capabilities and experiences together with specific conditions in which man is presented with options. Human beings are thus agents within the life word form and are therefore able to react to specific situations in ways that either maintain those conditions or change them (Gustafson, 1983, p. 167). According to Gustafson (1983), the doctrine of original establishes the origins of human sin and dictates that man has choices in certain situations. The superpower to feel guilt and to determine appropriate responses is borne out of human